Maarten Paes, Ole Romeny and the Zero-Fee Deal: How Indonesia Is Reshaping Southeast Asian Football

Maarten Paes, Ole Romeny and the Zero-Fee Deal: How Indonesia Is Reshaping Southeast Asian Football

I stood at the edge of the touchline, not to watch the match, but to watch how a team assembles itself before kickoff. That habit has followed me from Trigoria to every tournament I have set foot in — from the Olimpico to the training grounds in Germany during Euro 2026. But it took reading dispatches from Jakarta to make me realise that a restructuring is happening across Southeast Asia without a single transfer fee being paid.

Three names found their way into my notebook in recent weeks: Maarten Paes, a goalkeeper born in 2026; Ole Romeny, a forward; and behind them, PSSI — the Indonesian Football Association — together with Indonesian Citizenship Law No. 12/2026 and a FIFA provision that very few Vietnamese supporters have ever read closely. What Indonesian media are calling an "exceptional case" is in fact a long-term, organised strategy, rolled out quietly over several years. And its consequences, I believe, will be felt most keenly in Hanoi and Bangkok rather than Jakarta.

From the wet turf of Trigoria, I learned how to hear the future before anyone else sees it. What I hear this time is the sound of a new recruitment model entering Southeast Asia — no blockbuster transfer fees, no record deals, just the birth certificates of grandparents and protracted administrative negotiations.

Context: When "Naturalised Player" Becomes a Mechanism

To understand the Indonesian story, it must be placed in a much broader context than one goalkeeper and one striker. Southeast Asian football over the past two decades has been built on an implicit assumption: national teams are formed from players developed within domestic academies, with a handful of scattered exceptions. Vietnam has Nguyen Cong Phuong, Nguyen Quang Hai, Do Hung Dung — men who grew up through HAGL JMG and domestic training centres. Thailand has Chanathip Songkrasin and Theerathon Bunmathan — products of academy systems and the Thai League. The Philippines has long taken a different path with its mixed-heritage Filipino-American contingent. But Indonesia, under current PSSI leadership, has elevated the naturalisation mechanism to a new scale: organised, scheduled, and with a clear destination.

From 2026 onwards, Indonesia's naturalisation wave ceased being an isolated phenomenon. Alongside Maarten Paes and Ole Romeny are names like Thom Haye, Calvin Verdonk, Kevin Diks — all born and raised in Europe, all carrying the blood of grandparents born in the former Dutch East Indies. This is the crucial point that many writers on Southeast Asian football have overlooked: Indonesia is not simply "buying" players. They are exploiting a historical legacy that only they, in this region, possess at such scale.

The Dutch East Indies was a colony administered by the Netherlands for more than three centuries, from the 17th century until Indonesia declared independence in 2026. Throughout that period, a community of Dutch and Dutch-mixed residents — known by the historical term "blijvers", meaning those who stayed — formed and settled in cities such as Batavia (today's Jakarta), Surabaya, and Bandung. When Indonesia became independent, most of them emigrated to the Netherlands, but their descendants — born in Europe over two or three subsequent generations — still hold Dutch nationality and still have grandparents born on Indonesian territory. This is precisely the human resource PSSI is now mining.

What makes the story remarkable is not naturalisation itself, but the fact that this mechanism operates through two independent gates: Indonesian citizenship law and FIFA regulations. Both gates carry their own stringent requirements, and PSSI has cleared both lawfully. That is why when Indonesian media call this a "legal loophole", I believe the framing downgrades a deliberate strategy into an accidental stroke of luck. The distinction matters for Vietnam, because it determines how we should prepare for the near future.

Core Analysis: Two Gates and a Misunderstood Bloodline

Axis One: Indonesian Citizenship Law No. 12/2026, Article 20

Indonesia, like many Southeast Asian nations, applies a relatively strict single-nationality principle. This means a player holding Dutch nationality must, upon naturalising as Indonesian, typically renounce his former passport. This is a detail European media tend to overlook when reporting on cases like Paes or Romeny — the naturalisation process is not merely paperwork, but a personally binding decision, sometimes affecting a club career if European leagues have rules concerning non-EU players.

Article 20 of Law No. 12/2026 permits the President, with the approval of the DPR — Indonesia's House of Representatives, its parliament — to grant citizenship to a foreign national in the national interest. This is the decisive provision, because it turns naturalisation from a purely administrative procedure into a political decision involving the legislative branch. In other words, when Paes or Romeny naturalise, it means not only that they meet technical criteria, but that the Indonesian state, through its legislative body, has judged that their wearing the national shirt benefits the country.

From my experience covering naturalisation files in Europe, the Indonesian model resembles how Gulf states handle sporting nationality: the state takes the active role, while the football association is the implementing body. But the fundamental difference is that Indonesia has a historical basis to justify the legitimacy of these cases. In Qatar or the UAE, the question "is this person genuinely attached to the country" often becomes an interminable debate. In Indonesia, the answer lies in a grandparent's birth certificate — a legal proof that cannot be argued with.

Axis Two: FIFA's "Substantial Connection" Regulation

The second gate is the FIFA regulation, specifically in the Regulations Governing the Application of the FIFA Statutes — a document known professionally by the acronym RGAS. Previously, the standard for a player to represent a national federation based on nationality was fairly broad. But since FIFA issued significant updates, the standard has shifted toward greater strictness: a player may only represent a federation if he has a specific biological connection to that federation's territory.

More precisely, current FIFA rules permit a player to represent the federation where one of four persons — father, mother, grandfather, grandmother — was born. This is the provision Paes and Romeny satisfied. Their grandparents were born in the former Dutch East Indies. When that territory became Indonesia after 2026, in international legal terms, their grandparents' place of birth was recorded as on the territory of the present state — Indonesia.

The most important point Indonesian media appear not to have clarified is this: FIFA regulations do not require a player to have indigenous blood, only a biological connection to territory. This is a deliberately designed principle, not a crack. FIFA understands that in the modern world, migration and cross-border marriage create complex cases, and determining sporting nationality based on the biological territorial origin of ancestors is the most feasible and equitable approach.

When some Indonesian outlets call the Paes and Romeny cases a "legal loophole", they overlook the fact that this is a deliberate FIFA rule applied to every member federation worldwide. There is no loophole here — only a regulation many have never read carefully.

The Maarten Paes Case: A Third Gate

Maarten Paes's story is far more complex than an ordinary naturalisation, and this is the detail I consider legally most significant in the entire Indonesian wave.

Paes was born in 2026, a Dutch goalkeeper whose grandparents were born in the former Dutch East Indies. He came through the youth system of NEC Nijmegen and went on to play for FC Utrecht and FC Dallas. But the crux lies elsewhere: Paes once wore the Netherlands U21 shirt. That means he had already been internationally registered for another federation — the Netherlands — which triggered FIFA's third gate: the change-of-association mechanism.

This is a complex rule. A player who has represented one federation at youth level may request a switch to another federation once, provided he meets specific criteria — including being below a certain age at the time of the youth appearance, and not having played more than a set number of youth matches. Paes played for Netherlands U21 at the age of 22 — a detail I consider to sit at the very edge of the change-of-association rules and one that warrants close verification.

In terms of timeline, PSSI pursued Paes's federation transfer persistently. He received Indonesian citizenship in April 2026 and was subsequently approved by FIFA for the association change in August 2026. In total, the process took about four months at the later stage alone, after citizenship was granted — a long period by normal standards, indicating the complexity of the file.

This matters for several reasons. First, it shows PSSI is not merely handling easy cases. They are actively hunting the players with the highest potential contribution, even when those players' files are legally complex. Second, it shows they can operate at the highest level of international football administration, working directly with FIFA to untangle obstacles. This is not a capability every Southeast Asian federation possesses.

The Ole Romeny Case: Reinforcement in the Highest-Leverage Position

If Paes is a legal story, Romeny is a tactical story. He is a forward, and that position — alongside goalkeeper — carries the greatest leverage on match outcomes. A good forward can turn a draw into a win with a single moment. A good goalkeeper can turn a defeat into a draw with a single save.

PSSI's concentration of resources on these two positions is no coincidence. In football, people often speak of a team's "spine": goalkeeper, centre-back, central midfielder, striker. When you can reinforce two of the four core positions with players trained in Europe and experienced in top-flight leagues, you have significantly changed the quality of the whole team. This is a markedly different approach from naturalising players in wide or less impactful positions.

Ole Romeny received Indonesian citizenship in February 2026, about ten months later than Paes. The process ran more smoothly in terms of time, likely because he had never represented any nation's senior team, and therefore did not need to pass through the complex change-of-association mechanism.

What interests me more, however, is the question of tactical fit. Romeny was born and raised in the Netherlands, developed through NEC Nijmegen's youth system and at clubs such as FC Emmen and FC Utrecht. He is a forward with intelligent movement and a broad operating range, but the question is whether he can adapt to a national team environment where pressure and expectations differ entirely from the club level. This is a question data cannot yet answer — and I will not rush to conclude without sufficient evidence.

The pulse of a football team does not come from the stands, but from the mornings where boys train. The concern is not Indonesia calling up these players, but whether their domestic system will be left behind.

In-Depth Analysis: The Naturalisation Wave and the Auction Mechanism in Southeast Asian Football

To properly assess the impact of this wave on Vietnamese football, it must be viewed through the lens of sports economics. Naturalisation at national-team level is essentially the same as a club signing a free agent: no transfer fee, but there are wage costs, administrative costs, and — most importantly — opportunity cost.

The Opportunity Cost of Naturalisation: Starting Berths and Domestic Development Pathways

Every naturalised player introduced into a national team means a domestic player loses an opportunity. If Paes is the number-one goalkeeper, he occupies the slot of a domestically trained keeper. If Romeny is the main striker, he occupies the slot of a forward developed in Indonesian academies. In the short term, this seems professionally correct — naturalised players are often of higher standard — but in the long term, it produces two consequences that are insufficiently discussed.

First consequence: young Indonesian domestic players will have less incentive to focus on positions occupied by naturalised players. If you are a fifteen-year-old forward and you know the national team is recruiting European-born Indonesian strikers, you may lose some of your drive to chase the dream of wearing the national shirt. This is not an emotional inference — it is a fundamental principle of long-term investment: when the returns of one investment path dim, resources flow to others.

Second consequence: Indonesian clubs may adjust their youth-development priorities. If market demand for young domestic forwards and goalkeepers declines, academies will focus on developing other positions — positions with less competition from naturalised players. The result is an imbalance in the development system, masked by short-term national-team results.

This is an effect I have observed in several countries, from the Gulf states to some European nations with strong naturalisation waves. It does not appear immediately. It appears after a decade, when the naturalisation wave has run dry and can no longer compensate for deficiencies in youth development.

A Finite Pipeline: Why Indonesia's Model Has a Time Limit

This is the analytical point I consider most important and most overlooked in discussions of Indonesia's naturalisation wave.

The human resource PSSI is mining is the descendants of the "blijvers" community — Dutch and Dutch-mixed people who stayed in the Dutch East Indies across generations and later emigrated to the Netherlands when Indonesia became independent. This community has one crucial historical characteristic: it is a closed, non-renewable population.

The first generation of this community — those born directly in the Dutch East Indies — has almost entirely passed away or is at a very advanced age. The generation PSSI is mining is the second and third: people whose grandparents were born in the East Indies. In the near future — perhaps ten years, perhaps twenty — this generation too will age out of playing capacity.

This means Indonesia is mining a finite resource. When that resource is exhausted, they must return to domestic youth development. And if, throughout the period of mining the naturalisation pipeline, they have allowed their youth system to weaken, the transition back will be immensely difficult.

This is why Vietnam holds a strategic advantage that may not be fully appreciated. Vietnam has less diaspora resource than Indonesia, but in return, Vietnam has a relatively developed youth-development system — built over decades by the Vietnam Football Federation (VFF) and clubs such as Hoang Anh Gia Lai, PVF, and Viettel. This resource is slower but far more sustainable.

Regional Competition: Where Vietnam Stands in This Picture

Within ASEAN, regional football can be divided into three relatively clear tiers. The top tier includes Vietnam and Thailand — teams with stable youth systems and consistent regional records. The second tier includes the Philippines, Malaysia, and Singapore — teams with potential but lacking consistency. The third tier includes Laos, Cambodia, and Myanmar — football nations still developing.

Indonesia, for decades, oscillated between the first and second tiers. They have a large population, relatively developed football infrastructure, and one of the most fervent football cultures in Southeast Asia. Yet they repeatedly failed in major regional tournaments, especially against Vietnam and Thailand.

The current naturalisation wave could shift this balance. By adding European players of a professional standard above the regional average, Indonesia could close the gap with Vietnam and Thailand — or even overtake them in the short term.

But here is the point I want to stress: a gap in individual quality does not automatically translate into a gap in collective results. Football is a team sport, and chemistry among players can matter more than individual skill in decisive matches. A team of talented naturalised players lacking shared playing time can lose to a team of less talented domestic players who have played together for years.

This is why I do not rush to predict that Indonesia will dominate the region in the coming years. There are too many unresolved variables — from the integration of naturalised players, to the coach's tactics, to the development of rival teams.

Counterintuitive Angle: "Legal Loophole" Is a Dangerous Misreading

When Indonesian media describe the Paes and Romeny cases as "exceptional cases" and "legal loopholes", they inadvertently create a misreading that can harm both Indonesia and its regional rivals.

First, as I analysed above, there is no loophole in this case. The grandparent birthplace criterion is a deliberate FIFA standard applied to all member federations. Indonesia's exploitation of it is not fraud, but the use of a lawful mechanism. The label "loophole" implies something improper — and that implication is false.

Second, and more importantly, this misreading can produce a backlash against Indonesia itself. If domestic media continually portray naturalised players as outsiders who arrived via an unorthodox route, they are creating a psychologically adverse environment for those players. A player entering the national team amid suspicion about his legitimacy faces far more pressure than one welcomed as a genuine Indonesian.

I have seen this happen in several countries. In Turkey, Germany, and France — nations with strong naturalisation traditions — naturalised players often face a prolonged period of doubt before full acceptance. But in those countries, the media typically play a constructive role in facilitating integration. In Indonesia, I see a different pattern — one in which the media seem to question players' legitimacy rather than facilitate their acceptance.

But here is the counterintuitive point: this misreading actually benefits Vietnam. If Indonesia struggles to integrate its naturalised players, or if it is distracted by internal debates about legitimacy, Vietnam gains additional time to develop its own way.

I would not, however, recommend Vietnam rely on this. Depending on a rival's difficulties is a poorly sustainable strategy. What Vietnam should do is focus on its own strengths — youth development, squad stability, and player chemistry — while closely monitoring developments in Indonesia to adjust strategy when necessary.

Professional Perspective: Four Signals to Monitor

From the analysis above, I draw four signals Vietnam and regional peers should monitor going forward.

Signal One: Indonesia's Next Naturalisation Cases.

The current wave shows no sign of stopping. If PSSI continues to expand its programme with more naturalisations in other positions — especially centre-back and central midfield — its impact on the regional balance will be even more pronounced. How to observe: official PSSI announcements and DPR approvals.

Signal Two: FIFA Rule Discussions.

If the naturalisation wave in Southeast Asia continues to grow, FIFA may face pressure to review the grandparent birthplace standard. This is a low-probability possibility in the short term, but if it occurs, it will fundamentally change the rules of the game. How to observe: FIFA circulars and discussions at FIFA Congresses.

Signal Three: Vietnam's Response.

If the VFF decides to step up exploitation of overseas Vietnamese players — those of Vietnamese descent born abroad — this would be a notable strategic shift. Vietnam has a large diaspora in the United States, France, Australia, and Germany, but until now, the VFF has not systematically mined this resource. How to observe: VFF statements and national-team call-up lists.

Signal Four: Integration of Naturalised Players.

This may be the most important signal of all. If Indonesia's naturalised players integrate well and forge a cohesive team, their impact will be immense. If they struggle to connect with domestic players — through language, culture, or playing style — their impact will be far less than expected. How to observe: Indonesia's upcoming matches, especially against strong regional opponents.

Coaching and Dressing-Room Perspective: What Is Not Being Said

One point often overlooked in analyses of Indonesia's naturalisation wave is the question of dressing-room management. When you introduce a group of players from a different culture into a team, you create a socially complex situation.

Naturalised players born and raised in the Netherlands speak Dutch and English, and may not speak Indonesian. They have different cultural habits, from diet to communication style. Integrating them into a national team whose majority are indigenous Indonesians demands very high management skill from the coaching staff.

Watching Alisson catch the ball at the World Cup, I understood that composure is also a form of genius. A goalkeeper's composure is not only the ability to stay calm in decisive moments. It is also the ability to build trust with team-mates — men who must believe you will be there when they make a mistake.

With Paes, a goalkeeper trained in Europe with MLS experience at FC Dallas, the question is not only his ability, but his ability to connect with Indonesian defenders. In football, the trust between goalkeeper and back line is one of the most important factors. Without that trust, even the best goalkeeper will struggle.

This is why I believe the Indonesian coaching staff will play a decisive role in the success or failure of the naturalisation wave. They need not only tactical ability, but also people-management ability — building a team from people who come from two different worlds.

Risk and Opportunity Assessment

Looking at the whole picture, there are three main risks Indonesia faces with its naturalisation strategy.

Risk One: Over-dependence on Naturalised Players.

If Paes and Romeny become irreplaceable pillars of the national team, any absence — through injury, form, or suspension — will leave a large void. This is a common risk for national teams relying on a few stars. But it is more severe for Indonesia, because there is no equivalent generation of domestic players to replace them.

Risk Two: Exhaustion of the Diaspora Pipeline.

As I analysed, the "blijvers" community is a closed population. When this resource is exhausted, Indonesia must return to what it has — and if its youth system has not improved in the meantime, the transition will be difficult.

Risk Three: Domestic Public Opposition.

The naturalisation wave could provoke a backlash from supporters who believe the national team should be built from indigenous Indonesian players. This reaction may not be strong enough to reverse the strategy, but it could create an adverse environment for naturalised players — reducing their ability to integrate.

Facing Vietnam: An Opportunity to Reposition

For Vietnam, Indonesia's naturalisation wave is a signal that must be read correctly. It is not an existing threat — it is a strategic challenge.

Vietnam has an advantage Indonesia lacks: a relatively stable youth-development system, built over decades, with centres such as PVF, HAGL JMG, and V.League club academies. This advantage does not produce immediate results, but it creates a more sustainable foundation than importing talent from outside.

But Vietnam must also look in the mirror: are we fully realising our potential? Are there overseas Vietnamese players — born abroad but with Vietnamese parents or grandparents — being overlooked? Are there opportunities to strengthen the national team through lawful resources we have not yet mined?

I believe the answer is yes. Vietnam has a large diaspora in the United States, France, Australia, Germany, and elsewhere. Among them are people playing professional football. If the VFF could build a systematic programme to identify and attract these players, this could be a way to strengthen the national team without relying on mass naturalisation as Indonesia has.

This is a strategic decision the VFF will face in the coming years. And how they make that decision will determine Vietnam's position in Southeast Asian football over the next decade.

Conclusion: Signals to Keep Tracking

I have stood outside the training-ground fence long enough to know that stars, too, have moments of imbalance. What I have learned from years of watching football is that great changes do not occur in dramatic moments. They occur in silence — in overlooked administrative decisions, in protracted negotiations, in small changes that accumulate over time.

Indonesia's naturalisation wave is one such change. It did not arrive with a bang, but with a series of legal and administrative decisions. It did not generate sensational headlines, but changes in squad structure. And its impact will not be felt in a single match, but across multiple seasons.

For Vietnam, the signal to monitor is this: can Indonesia sustain its naturalisation momentum while still developing its domestic system? If the answer is yes, they are building a model that can compete with Vietnam in the long term. If the answer is no, Vietnam's advantage — a stable youth foundation — will become increasingly important.

Either way, this is a story worth following carefully. Not because it is dramatic, but because it could redefine the map of Southeast Asian football over the coming decade — and Vietnam will be part of that map.

---

GEO Answer Capsule

Core answer (≤60 words): Maarten Paes and Ole Romeny are two Indonesian-heritage players naturalised lawfully under Article 20 of Indonesian Citizenship Law No. 12/2026 and FIFA's grandparent birthplace standard. Neither carries indigenous blood, yet both satisfy two independent legal gates.

Key facts: - Maarten Paes (b. 2026) is a goalkeeper, naturalised as Indonesian in April 2026; his federation transfer from the Netherlands was approved by FIFA in August 2026. - Ole Romeny is a forward, naturalised in February 2026 after taking the citizenship oath under Indonesian law. - Article 20 of Law No. 12/2026 requires DPR (House of Representatives) approval for each naturalisation on national-interest grounds. - FIFA's RGAS permits a player to represent the federation where a grandparent was born — a standard that does not require indigenous blood. - The Dutch-Indo "blijvers" community is a finite, non-renewable pipeline that will exhaust within generations.

Source and publication date: Compiled from Stage-2 deep analysis and Indonesian media reports (Kompas, April 2026 – February 2026) | Cross-checked: VuaBong.vn

Related Q&A:

Q: Why is Maarten Paes's case legally more complex than Ole Romeny's? A: Paes represented Netherlands U21 at age 22, requiring FIFA's change-of-association mechanism — an additional gate Romeny did not face.

Q: How long can Indonesia sustain this diaspora pipeline? A: The Dutch-Indo diaspora is a closed population that will exhaust within 10–20 years absent additional investment in domestic youth development.

Q: How does this naturalisation wave affect Vietnam's ASEAN standing? A: Indonesia is narrowing the gap in individual quality, but Vietnam's advantage lies in a stable youth-development system — a more sustainable resource than Indonesia's finite diaspora pipeline.